Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.creatorMenezes, Pedro Henrique Barreto
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-23T18:50:39Z
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-22T17:33:06Z
dc.date.available2023-03-22T17:33:06Z
dc.date.issued2020-07-13
dc.identifier.citationMENEZES, Pedro Henrique Barreto. Acesso à justiça e a (in)constitucionalidade da sucumbência no processo do trabalho após a Lei 13.467/17. 2020. 100 f. Dissertação (Mestrado) - Universidade Católica de Pernambuco. Programa de Pós-graduação em Direito. Mestrado em Direito, 2020.por
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12032/76980
dc.description.abstractLaw 13.467 / 17 introduced in the Consolidation of Labor Laws the payment of attorney fees, in the event of succumbence, under the terms of article 791-A. The objective of the research is to analyze whether the mentioned institute (succumbence) is ruled or not of unconstitutionality, in violation of the content of article 5, XXXV, of CF / 88 (access to justice), facing, therefore, the substantive due process, which deals with the reasonableness and proportionality that standards must have. To do so, we will discuss some guidelines that will guide the interpreter in assessing this reasonableness and proportionality. Thus, we will analyze the degree of effectiveness of the rule contained in article 5, XXXV, of CF / 88, showing its contained nature, and which therefore admits restrictions in the infraconstitutional plan. We will also deal with the legal framework that governs succumbential fees - subjective right of the lawyer with a food nature - in the light of the principle of causality. Finally, we will analyze the hyposufficiency and the principle of worker protection, highlighting the information and interpretive function of this principle, which will result not in the impossibility of collecting fees due to the succumbence, but in the way of fixing and demanding the funds. As a conclusion, comparing all these variables, it will be seen that succumbence is a necessary and appropriate measure, complying with the vectors of reasonableness and proportionality, thus not offending article 5, XXXV, of the CF / 88. The developed research used the hypothetical-deductive method, with a qualitative approach and bibliographic and documentary procedure.eng
dc.formatapplication/pdf*
dc.languageporpor
dc.publisherUniversidade Católica de Pernambucopor
dc.rightsAcesso Abertopor
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subjectDissertaçõespor
dc.subjectAdvogados - Honoráriospor
dc.subjectProcesso legal justopor
dc.subjectProporcionalidade (Direito)por
dc.subjectProcesso do trabalhopor
dc.subjectDissertationseng
dc.subjectLawyers - Feeseng
dc.subjectFair legal processeng
dc.subjectProportionality (Right)eng
dc.subjectWork processeng
dc.titleAcesso à justiça e a (in)constitucionalidade da sucumbência no processo do trabalho após a Lei 13.467/17:por
dc.typeDissertaçãopor


Ficheros en el ítem

FicherosTamañoFormatoVer
OK_pedro_henrique_barreto_menezes.pdf622.6Kbapplication/pdfVer/

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Acesso Aberto
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Acesso Aberto

© AUSJAL 2022

Asociación de Universidades Confiadas a la Compañía de Jesús en América Latina, AUSJAL
Av. Santa Teresa de Jesús Edif. Cerpe, Piso 2, Oficina AUSJAL Urb.
La Castellana, Chacao (1060) Caracas - Venezuela
Tel/Fax (+58-212)-266-13-41 /(+58-212)-266-85-62

Nuestras redes sociales

facebook Facebook

twitter Twitter

youtube Youtube

Asociaciones Jesuitas en el mundo
Ausjal en el mundo AJCU AUSJAL JESAM JCEP JCS JCAP