A reorientação do princípio republicano a partir da solidariedade: o cosmopolitismo na coisa pública

Abstract

The objective is to establish a proposal to face the crisis of the state and also human. It is considered the Republic as a legal and political environment more suitable for the individual to develop its individual and social freedom, ie, taking responsibility for their own lives and conditions of the community. The study highlights the double-sided nature: the individual and social. One does not exclude the other, so do not opted for liberalism nor communitarianism, but it seems that a third option, the republicanism. However, this is not the political itself, but the idea that law involves the respublica. Partners' shares (socii) to one with another and to the state, ie, the republicanism as a practical and legal expression of a political that favors freedom, equality and, included himself, solidarity. Solidarity is treated as a legal element of the differences aggregator's own individuality in a dynamic interrelation in favor of human beings and the society. It must be scaled not only to the internal sphere, butworldwide. Cosmopolitanism is the limit point of the work, namely the Republic thought is directed to the cosmopolitan idea, democratically open to different. These are the demands of the current globalization movement, not only driven by economic factors. To be able to implement a republic, not hold it in allegorical rant and words in the Constitution to the republic of solidarity that develops in the public and take care of the assets and public interests, it is necessary to define the public sphere and the public assets, since on them rests the republican activity. In order to establish the respublica in practical terms, how to do it everyday, they settled ten ducts to act in solidarity: donate to the common good, recognizing the rights of all, value the diversity of opinion; establish a spirit of dialogue; reject politics as dogma, easing the decision untilthen considered extreme and irreversible; responsibility in taking care of his own personality; abandon the idea that everything is due to another; to educate, with practice, the descendants of what is involved in a republican state, and nurture loyaltyin and with the respublica. This solidarity is directed to the human race, regardless of nationality or choice of life philosophy. Also, states should be solidarity with individuals and with other states. Solidarity in the Republic, at bottom, shows the character, at these times weakened, the essence of being-there-with-others. It is essential condition to share a single space with distinct personalities and endless. It is the liaison between the outgoing legend (private sphere) forming the environment of the Republic.