Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.advisorSellitto, Miguel Afonso
dc.contributor.authorMâncio, Vagner Gerhardt
dc.date.accessioned2016-02-15T15:42:38Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-22T19:19:13Z
dc.date.available2016-02-15T15:42:38Z
dc.date.available2022-09-22T19:19:13Z
dc.date.issued2015-07-03
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12032/59490
dc.description.abstractThe competition between companies is increasingly a factor of survival, and the search for differential is the main objective for companies to become highlights in the market and remain competitive. In order to contribute to the development of companies with a variety of products and an average rate of production, this research was carried out on the feasibility of large investments in automation and the creation of a method for choosing equipment from a vision strategic, considering the main dimensions of competition: cost, quality, flexibility, delivery. The research is delimited in the Flexible Manufacturing Systems field (FMS) whose strategic analysis and automation equipment have flexible systems characteristics. The research was conducted in the qualitative and quantitative modeling methodology, in which, through the modeling of scenarios, could be carried out qualitative and quantitative assessments; the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) was used to determine the setting that best suits the key competitive variable. For the development of research, business expert opinions were collected on the comparative weights of AHP and on the automation equipment that are part of the created scenarios. Scenario 1 has ladder layout with the movement of the materials carried by pallets through mats, in which the handling of materials is achieved by pneumatic systems. Scenario 2 has the open layout with the movement of materials held by Automated Guided Vehicle (AGV), able to supply and unloading equipment. Scenario 3 has focused on the layout robot, in which there are three robots, moving on a conveyor and load and unload the equipment. Two methods of calculating the final merit of the scenarios were proposed. By both methods, the best scenario was the 3. Additionally, the conclusion is that adopting the scenario 3 is better than doing nothing, that is, continue with the current installation of cell studied.en
dc.description.sponsorshipNenhumapt_BR
dc.languagept_BRpt_BR
dc.publisherUniversidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinospt_BR
dc.rightsopenAccesspt_BR
dc.subjectFlexible manufacturing system (FMS)en
dc.subjectAutomaçãopt_BR
dc.titleMétodo de apoio à decisão de escolha de tecnologia em sistemas flexíveis de manufatura: estudo de casopt_BR
dc.typeDissertaçãopt_BR


Ficheros en el ítem

FicherosTamañoFormatoVer
Vagner Gerhardt Mâncio_.pdf2.330Mbapplication/pdfVer/

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem


© AUSJAL 2022

Asociación de Universidades Confiadas a la Compañía de Jesús en América Latina, AUSJAL
Av. Santa Teresa de Jesús Edif. Cerpe, Piso 2, Oficina AUSJAL Urb.
La Castellana, Chacao (1060) Caracas - Venezuela
Tel/Fax (+58-212)-266-13-41 /(+58-212)-266-85-62

Nuestras redes sociales

facebook Facebook

twitter Twitter

youtube Youtube

Asociaciones Jesuitas en el mundo
Ausjal en el mundo AJCU AUSJAL JESAM JCEP JCS JCAP