Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.creatorPrazeres, Paulo Joviniano Álvares dos
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-26T11:45:42Z
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-22T17:34:13Z
dc.date.available2023-03-22T17:34:13Z
dc.date.issued2022-08-19
dc.identifier.citationPRAZERES, Paulo Joviniano Álvares dos. Do protagonismo judicial ao diálogo institucional : os meios de resolução alternativa de conflitos como instrumentos à desjudicializaçãp da saúde. 2022. 162 f. Tese (Doutorado) - Universidade Católica de Pernambuco. Programa de Pós-graduação em Direito. Doutorado em Direito, 2022.por
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12032/77170
dc.description.abstractAlthough a vast academic production on the phenomenon of judicialization can be verified, the theme still encompasses numerous controversies and a solution is pending. The growing judicialization correlates with the fact that the Judiciary is now required to decide on the compatibility of commissive and omissive acts of state power. In this sense, the present study will analyze decisions of general repercussion issued by the STF and if it is possible to verify the existence of parameters regarding the judicialization of health, and, through a partially comparative analysis, the work will also observe emblematic decisions of the Colombian Court and of South Africa, and how each of these countries deals with this phenomenon. As an alternative to the growing judicialization, the work will cover the importance of institutional dialogues and the possibility of resolving conflicts in the health area, through alternative methods of conflict resolution. In this way, it will be possible to demonstrate, through practical cases that are in progress in several Brazilian states, the success of alternative means of conflict resolution in the health area, in order to provide greater effectiveness of this constitutional guarantee, in addition to reducing public spending and curb judicialization. The research uses the method of systematic literature review, as it corresponds to the use of several literature reviews to efficiently integrate and analyze a large amount of information, enabling a more effective decision/conclusion.eng
dc.description.sponsorshipFundação de Amparo a Ciência e Tecnologia do Estado de Pernambuco - FACEPEpor
dc.formatapplication/pdf*
dc.languageporpor
dc.publisherUniversidade Católica de Pernambucopor
dc.rightsAcesso Abertopor
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subjectTesespor
dc.subjectDireitos fundamentais - Brasilpor
dc.subjectDireito à saúdepor
dc.subjectPoder judiciário e questões políticas - Brasilpor
dc.subjectTheseseng
dc.subjectFundamental rights - Brazileng
dc.subjectRight to healtheng
dc.subjectJudiciary and political issues - Brazileng
dc.titleDo protagonismo judicial ao diálogo institucional: os meios de resolução alternativa de conflitos como instrumentos à desjudicializaçãp da saúde.por
dc.typeTesepor


Ficheros en el ítem

FicherosTamañoFormatoVer
Ok_paulo_joviniano_alvares_prazeres.pdf14.77Mbapplication/pdfVer/

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Acesso Aberto
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Acesso Aberto

© AUSJAL 2022

Asociación de Universidades Confiadas a la Compañía de Jesús en América Latina, AUSJAL
Av. Santa Teresa de Jesús Edif. Cerpe, Piso 2, Oficina AUSJAL Urb.
La Castellana, Chacao (1060) Caracas - Venezuela
Tel/Fax (+58-212)-266-13-41 /(+58-212)-266-85-62

Nuestras redes sociales

facebook Facebook

twitter Twitter

youtube Youtube

Asociaciones Jesuitas en el mundo
Ausjal en el mundo AJCU AUSJAL JESAM JCEP JCS JCAP