dc.creator | Marins, Jéssica Ferreira | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-08-11T12:37:37Z | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-03-22T17:33:01Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-03-22T17:33:01Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2021-02-19 | |
dc.identifier.citation | MARINS, Jéssica Ferreira. Discussão sobre a caracterização da reatividade de agregados graúdo utilizados na fabricação de concretos. 2021. 74 f. Dissertação (Mestrado) - Universidade Católica de Pernanbuco - Programa de Pós-graduação em Engenharia Civil. Mestrado em Engenharia Civil, 2021. | por |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12032/76960 | |
dc.description.abstract | The alkali-aggregate reaction (AAR) is a deleterious chemical reaction that involves sodium and
potassium ions, mainly from Portland cement, some mineral phases that may be present in large
aggregates or small amounts that in the presence of water can cause expansions in concrete
structures. Knowing the mineralogy of the aggregate is fundamental, because avoiding the use
of reactive aggregate prevents the appearance of this pathological manifestation. The objective
of this work is to make a comparison between the different test methodologies for determining
the expansion of concrete prisms by the accelerated method, Brazilian standard NBR 15577-
7:2018 with RILEM AAR-4.1:2016 and modified AASHTO T 380:2018. The methodologies
proposed by NBR and RILEM are very similar, differing only in the amount of aggregates and
cement consumption. The method proposed by AASHTO differs in the packaging and time of the
test. As the intention of this research is to evaluate the conditions of the test environment the
same mold size was maintained for all evaluated methodologies. For the execution of all tests it
was used a reactive large aggregate and innocuous small aggregate. The specimens tested by
the NBR and RILEM methods pointed out that the large aggregate used is reactive at first
reading, where the dimensional variation of the prisms was greater than 0.03%, the limit
proposed by both standards. The prisms behaved in relation to the very similar expansion. The
methodologies proposed by NBR and RILEM last 20 weeks, with an interval of 5 weeks for each
reading. Analyzing the results found in the test that was obtained with the packaging
environment as proposed by AASHTO T380: 2018 it is possible to conclude that the speed of
occurrence of the expansion is greater than in the other methodologies. This is because the test
conditions are very aggressive. This lasts for 56 days, readings are taken with small intervals
between ages. After conducting the proposed tests and analyzing the data found, it is possible
to verify that all the studied standards fulfill the main objective of characterizing the aggregate in
terms of alkali silica reactivity. | eng |
dc.description.sponsorship | Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - CAPES | por |
dc.format | application/pdf | * |
dc.language | por | por |
dc.publisher | Universidade Católica de Pernambuco | por |
dc.rights | Acesso Aberto | por |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | |
dc.subject | Dissertações | por |
dc.subject | Materiais de construção | por |
dc.subject | Reação álcalis-agregado | por |
dc.subject | Dissertations | eng |
dc.subject | Construction materials | eng |
dc.subject | Alkali-aggregate reaction | eng |
dc.title | Discussão sobre a caracterização da reatividade de agregados graúdo utilizados na fabricação de concretos. | por |
dc.type | Dissertação | por |