| dc.description.abstract | The present work is in the field of Constitutional Law, in the area of concentration of
constitutional jurisdiction and fundamental rights. Its purpose is verify the performance
of the Judiciary Power of the Member States with regard to the control of
constitutionality, specifically, to direct actions of unconstitutionality. To this end, it will
be assumed that: (i) if the Law 9.868 / 1999, which instituted amici curiae in Brazilian
legal system, specifically in the control of constitutionality in the abstract modality
through ADI's, deals with the participation of these actors in the actions proposed at
the STF, then, this Law has no incidence at the subnational level; (ii) if Brazil, because
it is politically organized as a Federal State, has several autonomous centers of political
power capable of elaborating its own Constitutions and legislative collections,
observing the limits given by the Federal Constitution, then these federal entities can
create their own admission criteria for amicus curiae in the processing of ADI's. Having
made this introduction, and considering that the Federal Constitution of 1988, in its art.
125, §2, establishes that each member state is responsible for the constitutional control
itself, not determining the respective limits, it is sought to identify the criteria required
by the Brazilian Courts of Justice to admit the amicus curiae's participation in direct
actions of unconstitutionality. In order to arrive at the result, a bibliographical review
will be done initially on the existing literature on the Brazilian constitutional design,
federalism and constitutional jurisdiction in the sphere of Member States. Then, from
the perspective of the opening of the constitutional interpretation to the society and of
the fundamental rights to the participation in the organization and procedure, will be
studied the figure of the amicus curiae. Afterwards, statistical data obtained through
the quantitative method will be presented in order to demonstrate the proportion
between the number of ADI's proposed before the Brazilian Courts of Justice and in
which of them there was a request for amicus curiae's participation, and then to verify
how many of these were accepted by the judges. After the quantitative analysis, the
qualitative examination of the dispatches and / or decisions handed down by the Courts
of Justice will be carried out, in order to identify the criteria used for the deferment of
the participation of the amici. | eng |
