Mostrar registro simples

dc.creatorCastro, Lauro Alves de
dc.date.accessioned2019-03-29T17:51:06Z
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-22T17:30:49Z
dc.date.available2023-03-22T17:30:49Z
dc.date.issued2018-03-08
dc.identifier.citationCASTRO, Lauro Alves de. Dogmática sobre a fundamentação analítica no CPC/2015: das decisões às postulações. 2018. 205 fl. Dissertação (Mestrado) - Universidade Católica de Pernambuco. Programa de Pós-graduação em Direito. Mestrado em Direito, 2018.por
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12032/76605
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this paper is to examine whether there is a burden of analytical reasoning directed to the submissions of the parties in the context of CPC/2015, based on the approach on how the fundamental norm inserted in art. 6º, of CPC / 2015, that positive the principle of cooperation, and the standardization of minimum requirements for drawing up reasoned decisions, as provided in paragraphs 1 and 2 of art. 489 of CPC/2015, influence the form of application of the parties and impact on the construction of jurisdictional pronouncements. Therefore, apart from the definition of procedural cooperation and its impact on the issue s addressed, from the development on the duty to motivate judicial decisions in Brazil, and from the exposition of the current requirements in the applications of the parties, the study starts from a reality already materialized in the ordinated by precedents of the Superior Court of Justice, in which an extensive interpretation of art. 489, § 1º, of CPC/2015, which represents the duty of analytical justification of judicial decisions, directed to magistrates, to the applications of the parties. Consequently, the legal consequences of a poorly articulated postulation, which does not represent an analytical basis, and whether there is a possibility of amendment or supplementation of those applications, will be investigated when the magistrates find that there is a deficiency in the legal arguments put forward by the parties. In order to make the approach more concise and dogmatic, the research will count on the subsumption to the bibliographical and jurisprudential review on the subject and will be based on positive law, specifically relating to the subject, the following provisions of the new CPC: Articles articles 6º, 319, III, 321, 330, I, §§ 2º e 3º, 336, 489, §§ 1º e 2º, 525, §§ 4º e 5º, 550, §§ 1º e 3º, 917, §§ 3º e 4º 932, III, 932, sole paragraph, e 966, § 6º; which represent, in practice, an indispensable part of the problem, which may influence the way the parties formulate their applications in the context of the new Brazilian civil process code.eng
dc.formatapplication/pdf*
dc.languageporpor
dc.publisherUniversidade Católica de Pernambucopor
dc.rightsAcesso Abertopor
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subjectProcesso civil - Brasilpor
dc.subjectDissertaçõespor
dc.subjectPrincípio de cooperaçãopor
dc.subjectFundamentação das decisões judiciaispor
dc.subjectDissertationseng
dc.subjectCivil lawsuit - Brazileng
dc.subjectPrinciple of cooperationeng
dc.subjectRationale for judicial decisionseng
dc.titleDogmática sobre a fundamentação analítica no CPC/2015: das decisões às postulações.por
dc.typeDissertaçãopor


Arquivos deste item

ArquivosTamanhoFormatoVisualização
lauro_alves _castro.pdf18.42Mbapplication/pdfVisualizar/Abrir

Este item aparece na(s) seguinte(s) coleção(s)

Mostrar registro simples

Acesso Aberto
Exceto quando indicado o contrário, a licença deste item é descrito como Acesso Aberto

© AUSJAL 2022

Asociación de Universidades Confiadas a la Compañía de Jesús en América Latina, AUSJAL
Av. Santa Teresa de Jesús Edif. Cerpe, Piso 2, Oficina AUSJAL Urb.
La Castellana, Chacao (1060) Caracas - Venezuela
Tel/Fax (+58-212)-266-13-41 /(+58-212)-266-85-62

Nuestras redes sociales

facebook Facebook

twitter Twitter

youtube Youtube

Asociaciones Jesuitas en el mundo
Ausjal en el mundo AJCU AUSJAL JESAM JCEP JCS JCAP