Show simple item record

dc.creatorOliveira, Alessandra Prôa Greenhalgh de
dc.date.accessioned2017-06-01T18:18:31Z
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-22T17:27:43Z
dc.date.available2015-04-07
dc.date.available2023-03-22T17:27:43Z
dc.date.issued2014-09-30
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12032/76074
dc.description.abstractApathy of the Brazilian State in the execution of his power / the duty to resolve intersubjective conflicts has as a direct consequence of the social discredit the judiciary, a fact confirmed by the data of the survey conducted by the Institute for Applied Economic Research (IPEA). Thus, it remained evident the urgent need to find solutions to the problem of delays in the judiciary. In the postmodern view of the procedural instrumentality, law is both guided by the fundamental constitutional rights, such as concretizing its precepts, whose magnum scope to social peace with justice. His instrument function is characterized by the achievement of substantive law with fairness and timeliness to ensure the effectiveness and usefulness of the decisions handed down. However, for the effective exercise of this function prolific, procedural law requires the establishment of mechanisms to ensure the speed of the procedural motion, as guaranteed by the Constitution. Focused this innate and before changing the concept of sentence introduced by Law 11.232/05 deficiency, the possibility arises from the breakup of the trial by the utterance of partial judgment on the merits, as a means of providing the citizen the desired speed. This institute has proved fully viable in the current systematic procedural, being advocated as a means of making permanent the constitutional principle providing a more reasonable length of proceedings. The study in this project, based on bibliographic research in books and articles by renowned jurists, along with analysis of legislative amendments to the Code of Civil Procedure and national case law, concluded that besides allowed by current law, the Office of the partial sentence merit was more effective in ensuring a speedy adjudication, providing a greater likelihood of effectiveness and usefulness of the sentence, being extremely beneficial to those who seek the tutelage Judiciary.eng
dc.formatapplication/pdfpor
dc.languageporpor
dc.publisherUniversidade Católica de Pernambucopor
dc.rightsAcesso Abertopor
dc.subjectdireitopor
dc.subjectprocesso civilpor
dc.subjectsentenças (processo civil)por
dc.subjectdissertaçõespor
dc.subjectlaweng
dc.subjectcivil procedureeng
dc.subjectsentences (civil procedure)eng
dc.subjectdissertationseng
dc.titleSentença parcial de mérito: a admissibilidade do fracionamento do julgado na atual sistemática processual como meio de concretização da garantia constitucional à razoável duração do processopor
dc.typeDissertaçãopor


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView
alessandra_proa_greenhalgh_oliveira.pdf644.4Kbapplication/pdfView/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


© AUSJAL 2022

Asociación de Universidades Confiadas a la Compañía de Jesús en América Latina, AUSJAL
Av. Santa Teresa de Jesús Edif. Cerpe, Piso 2, Oficina AUSJAL Urb.
La Castellana, Chacao (1060) Caracas - Venezuela
Tel/Fax (+58-212)-266-13-41 /(+58-212)-266-85-62

Nuestras redes sociales

facebook Facebook

twitter Twitter

youtube Youtube

Asociaciones Jesuitas en el mundo
Ausjal en el mundo AJCU AUSJAL JESAM JCEP JCS JCAP