This study aims to address the urgent measures as an assessment of a reasonable duration of process temporally fair. As in all academic work, which seeks to find an
answer to a given question or the solution to a given problem, this thesis aims to whether the emergency measures, the Code of Civil Procedure, are sufficient to
determine the duration of a temporal process as fair. In preparing this study explored the following themes: the dimensions of time, his relationship with the universe and the legal context of urgency in this particularity, the grounds of time and law; emergency measures in the law (with a focus on the provision of and effectiveness of the judicial process ensuring a reasonable period of readjustment process and procedural guarantees in terms of attenuation of the duration and procedural simplification) the similarities and differences between the conservative and anticipating the effects of protection from the perspective of Piero Calamandrei and Ovid Baptista da Silva
Araújo, a constitution for the protection of emergency; Law in Post-modernity and its crisis, and the jurisdiction of urgency and the need to resize it. He came to the
conclusion that the emergency measures, the Code of Civil Procedure, are insufficient to solve the problems of postmodern society
