| dc.contributor.author | Preciado, Adolfo | |
| dc.contributor.author | Lester, Jamie | |
| dc.contributor.author | Ingham, Jason Maxwell | |
| dc.contributor.author | Pender, Michael | |
| dc.contributor.author | Wang, Guojue | |
| dc.coverage.spatial | New Zealand | es |
| dc.coverage.temporal | 2010-2014 | es |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2016-05-18T18:34:20Z | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-03-21T18:09:14Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2016-05-18T18:34:20Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2023-03-21T18:09:14Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2014-10 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Preciado, A., Lester, J., Ingham, J. M., Pender, M. and Wang, G. (2014). “Performance of the Christchurch, New Zealand Cathedral during the M7.1 2010 Canterbury earthquake”. 9th International Conference on Structural Analysis of Historical Constructions (SAHC), October 14-17, Mexico City. | es |
| dc.identifier.issn | 04-2014-102011495500-102 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12032/74202 | |
| dc.description | The Catholic Cathedral is classified as a category 1 listed heritage building constructed largely of unreinforced stone masonry, and was significantly damaged in the recent Canterbury earthquakes of 2010 and 2011. In the 2010 event the building presented slight to moderta damage, meanwhile in the 2011 one experienced ground shaking in excess of its capacity leading to block failures and partial collapse of parts of the building, which left the building standing but still posing a significant hazard. In this paper we discuss the approach to develop the earthquake analysis of the building by 3D numerical simulations, and the results are compared/calibrated with the observed damage of the 2010 earthquake. Very accurate records were obtained during both earthquakes due to a record station located least than 80 m of distance from the building and used in the simulations. Moreover it is included in the model the soil structure interaction because it was observed that the ground and foundation played an important role on the seismic behavior of the structure. A very good agreement was found between the real observed damage and the nonlinear dynamic simulations described trough inelastic deformation (cracking) and building´s performance. | es |
| dc.description.sponsorship | University of Auckland | es |
| dc.description.sponsorship | Polytechnical University of Guadalajara | es |
| dc.language.iso | eng | es |
| dc.publisher | 2014 Structural Analysis of Historical Constructions | es |
| dc.relation.ispartofseries | International Conference on Structural Analysis of Historical Constructions;9th | |
| dc.rights.uri | http://quijote.biblio.iteso.mx/licencias/CC-BY-NC-ND-2.5-MX.pdf | es |
| dc.subject | Christchurch | es |
| dc.subject | Canterbury Earthquakes | es |
| dc.subject | Cathedral | es |
| dc.subject | Historical Masonry | es |
| dc.subject | Seismic Performance | es |
| dc.subject | Nonlinear Analysis | es |
| dc.subject | Soil-structure Interaction | es |
| dc.subject | Retrofitting | es |
| dc.title | Performance of the Christchurch, New Zealand Cathedral during the M7.1 2010 Canterbury earthquake | es |
| dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/conferencePaper | es |
