| dc.description.abstract | This dissertation analyses concepts of disability and their influence on
unequal treatment among persons with disabilities (PWD). This study explores the
concept of disability and its impact on material equality provided by the Brazilian
Federal Constitution and has its main objective is to analyze the unequal treatment
of single-sided deafness and vision by the Brazilian Judiciary. This study will
consider the matter of the Decree 3,298/99 and its literal interpretation. The initial
hypotheses were: a) negative, considering that the unequal treatment is legitimate,
well-founded, and legal, with no associated subjective factors and that, therefore,
there is no need to discuss limiting material equality between disabilities; and b)
positive, in the sense of the illegitimacy of the difference in treatment originating
from the literal interpretation of Decree 3,298 / 99, the result of a subjective factor
of the judge, so that its limitation undermines the achievement of material equality
to groups with disabilities other than those determined by it. This study was
conducted through bibliographic and documentary research using a deductive and
qualitative methodology for exploratory purposes. The in-depth study of the issue
brought to light the incongruity of the Decree with the rest of the normative system
in a way that literal interpretation becomes impossible when considering the
enactment of international norms and legislative instruments that bring a more
comprehensive and humane view of the person with disabilities and further
emphasizes the incongruity within the Legislative Decree itself, concluding that the
Article 4th of Decree 3,298/99; Binding Precedents No. 377 and No. 552 and
sentences handed down after July 9th, 2008, involving unequal treatment between
people with single-sided deafness and monocular blindness are unconstitucional. | en |
