Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.advisorGiering, Maria Eduarda
dc.contributor.authorMarinho, Cristhiano Alessi Rabelo
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-27T12:04:10Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-22T19:40:52Z
dc.date.available2020-10-27T12:04:10Z
dc.date.available2022-09-22T19:40:52Z
dc.date.issued2020-09-28
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12032/63736
dc.description.abstractWhen a citizen appeals to the judicial body to solve a conflict without the presence of a lawyer, the State is committed to addressing him directly. For this reason, the institute of jus postulandi was created, that is the ability given to someone to postulate, before the judicial authorities, his/her claims in court, without the assistance of a lawyer. However, it is impossible to deny that Brazilian legislation was written for all citizens, based on the language adopted in Brazilian law with a lot of slangs, legal terms and expression in Latin. This language complexity, plus the lack of knowledge in the discursive genders in which is involved the judicial proceeding of the participants, in the proceeding development and its steps, becomes an obstacle to ordinary citizens, hindering the understating and the access of those who resort the judicial. Therefore, the aim of this research is to verify how the construction of meanings of the language act in the law field takes place in judicial proceedings of the Special Court of Governador Valadares/MG, when one of the parties is not represented by a lawyer. For that, it is used the Semiolinguistic Discourse Theory (SDT) in which the language is an act that involves the participation of the subjects who interact socially and produce the senses from this interaction. According to the French linguist’s thoughts, Patrick Charaudeau, who proposes an ordinary language phenomenon analysis model based on three levels: the situational, the discursive and the semiolinguistic, judicial proceedings with jus postulandi were analyzed, considering the situational, discursive and textual issues involved in the production of the language act in the legal field. The results of our analyzes suggest that the jus postulandi is submitted to an extremely complex and technical system, which draws itself from judicial argumentation. If for the ones who work in the law field it is a hard task to understand the complexity of the argumentative game, what will be said about the ordinary citizen, who does not understand the legal world in all its dimension.en
dc.description.sponsorshipNenhumapt_BR
dc.languagept_BRpt_BR
dc.publisherUniversidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinospt_BR
dc.rightsopenAccesspt_BR
dc.subjectJus postulandipt_BR
dc.subjectSemiolinguistic discourse theoryen
dc.titleUma problemática comunicacional entre o judiciário e o cidadão comum: o caso do instituto do jus postulandipt_BR
dc.typeDissertaçãopt_BR


Ficheros en el ítem

FicherosTamañoFormatoVer
Cristhiano Alesso Rabelo Marinho_.pdf7.795Mbapplication/pdfVer/

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem


© AUSJAL 2022

Asociación de Universidades Confiadas a la Compañía de Jesús en América Latina, AUSJAL
Av. Santa Teresa de Jesús Edif. Cerpe, Piso 2, Oficina AUSJAL Urb.
La Castellana, Chacao (1060) Caracas - Venezuela
Tel/Fax (+58-212)-266-13-41 /(+58-212)-266-85-62

Nuestras redes sociales

facebook Facebook

twitter Twitter

youtube Youtube

Asociaciones Jesuitas en el mundo
Ausjal en el mundo AJCU AUSJAL JESAM JCEP JCS JCAP