Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorTutikian, Bernardo Fonseca
dc.contributor.authorFühr, Andréia Grasiela
dc.date.accessioned2017-10-16T13:23:47Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-22T19:27:17Z
dc.date.available2017-10-16T13:23:47Z
dc.date.available2022-09-22T19:27:17Z
dc.date.issued2017-07-19
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12032/61066
dc.description.abstractThere is growing the concern about the performance of buildings concorcomitantly with the damage caused to the environment during the execution of a work. Under the concept of the triple bottom line, it is extremely important to analyse the materials that make up a building, as they influence the factors that can reduce costs, improve performance of the building and minimize environmental impacts. In order to improve thermal performance, reduce your weight and reduce costs with the structure can be used monolithic panels in EPS and vertical seals. Monolithic EPS panels comprise a core of expanded polystyrene (EPS), surrounded by metal mesh and a coating layer. It will be consideration to influence of the structure and cost of the work is the masonry walls were replaced by monolithic panels in EPS. For this purpose, it will be used a design of a building of 4 floors with área of 1342,00 m² and another project of a horizontal condominium with a total area of 600,43m², evaluating two typologies. From this projects was dimensioned the structure with walls in ceramic blocks and monolithic panels in EPS. The calculation models were analyzed to quantify the total concrete and steel in each option. The concrete quantitative analysis showed a reduction of 10,69% in the building of 4 floors ans 7,23% in the condominium with the monolithic panels of EPS. In the quantity of steel, the difference was slightly lower, of 6,02% in the building of 4 floors and 1,69% in the horizontal condominium. EPS monolithic panels also had advantages over the total budget of the structure and fences and in relation to the execution time of the work. The budget os the building with 4 floors was 4,92% cheaper, wich represents a saving of R$ 30.698,08. And the execution time was reduced by 19 days, adopting this system. In the horizontal condominium budget, the difference was similar, of 4,90%, wich represents a saving of R$ 12.227,74. And the execution time of this building would be reduced in 18 days.en
dc.description.sponsorshipNenhumapt_BR
dc.languagept_BRpt_BR
dc.publisherUniversidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinospt_BR
dc.rightsopenAccesspt_BR
dc.subjectPainéis monolíticos em EPSpt_BR
dc.subjectConcrete Insulated panels with EPSen
dc.titleAnálise estrutural e de custos de estruturas de concreto armado com vedações verticais com painéis monolíticos em eps e com blocos cerâmicospt_BR
dc.typeDissertaçãopt_BR


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView
Andréia Grasiela Führ_.pdf1.188Mbapplication/pdfView/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


© AUSJAL 2022

Asociación de Universidades Confiadas a la Compañía de Jesús en América Latina, AUSJAL
Av. Santa Teresa de Jesús Edif. Cerpe, Piso 2, Oficina AUSJAL Urb.
La Castellana, Chacao (1060) Caracas - Venezuela
Tel/Fax (+58-212)-266-13-41 /(+58-212)-266-85-62

Nuestras redes sociales

facebook Facebook

twitter Twitter

youtube Youtube

Asociaciones Jesuitas en el mundo
Ausjal en el mundo AJCU AUSJAL JESAM JCEP JCS JCAP