Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorStreck, Lenio Luiz
dc.contributor.authorBarba, Rafael Giorgio Dalla
dc.date.accessioned2017-09-28T17:02:31Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-22T19:27:04Z
dc.date.available2017-09-28T17:02:31Z
dc.date.available2022-09-22T19:27:04Z
dc.date.issued2017-08-08
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12032/61021
dc.description.abstractThe thesis addresses the issue of legal argumentation in judicial decisions that interpret and apply fundamental rights norms. This approach is taken out from the perspective of the discursive theory of Robert Alexy, an important contemporary German philosopher. The first chapter exposes some philosophical origins and foundations that support the basic structure of his theory, showing in details the relationship from the dichotomy between perfect and imperfect duties in Kant to the structural distinction between rules and principles. The second chapter performs a compiled reconstruction of the central elements of Alexy’s discursive theory, linking the theory of principles with the theory of legal argumentation, while addressing the relationship between law and morality in the author's thinking. The third chapter, in turn, brings the development of the philosophical and methodological discussion previously exposed a judicial case judged by the Federal Supreme Court, demonstrating not only the simplification of the reasoning used by the Constitutional Court, but also the limits of the discursive procedure presented by Alexy to ensure the rationality of legal argumentation. The thesis has as its basic purpose a general exposition of Alexy's discursive theory based on some of its philosophical foundations, taking as its guiding line the problem of judicial discretion and practical reflexes. In addition, it offers some critics to this proposal, pointing out three possible objections to this theoretical model, which correspond respectively to the three central components of discursive theory: theory of principles, theory of legal argumentation and the inclusive non-positivist concept of Law. The methodology used on the development of the college paper was taken out from extensive consultation and bibliographical review in specialized material appropriate to the theme. As partial results, from the philosophical reference adopted by Alexy, his discursive theory can offer important resources to face the problem of legal reasoning in judicial decision, including by incorporating rationalization criteria of moral arguments that enter on legal discourse, but still remains a considerable discretion space to determine the justification of judicial decision, in order that the result may vary due to different values and deadlocks, ratifying even antagonistic positions.en
dc.description.sponsorshipCAPES - Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superiorpt_BR
dc.languagept_BRpt_BR
dc.publisherUniversidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinospt_BR
dc.rightsopenAccesspt_BR
dc.subjectArgumentação jurídicapt_BR
dc.subjectLegal reasoningen
dc.titleA (in)transparência dos direitos fundamentais: das origens aos limites da teoria discursiva em Robert Alexypt_BR
dc.typeDissertaçãopt_BR


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView
Rafael Giorgio Dalla Barba_.pdf1.134Mbapplication/pdfView/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


© AUSJAL 2022

Asociación de Universidades Confiadas a la Compañía de Jesús en América Latina, AUSJAL
Av. Santa Teresa de Jesús Edif. Cerpe, Piso 2, Oficina AUSJAL Urb.
La Castellana, Chacao (1060) Caracas - Venezuela
Tel/Fax (+58-212)-266-13-41 /(+58-212)-266-85-62

Nuestras redes sociales

facebook Facebook

twitter Twitter

youtube Youtube

Asociaciones Jesuitas en el mundo
Ausjal en el mundo AJCU AUSJAL JESAM JCEP JCS JCAP