| dc.description.abstract | The present work aims, from philosophical premises of Martin Heidegger (formal evidences), lay the foundation for building a proper interpretive theory for the law, especially in what regards to the meaning of things (legal concepts), without ever losing view of democracy and respect for the Constitution. The idea is to reconstruct some of Heidegger's trajectory towards the phenomenology of facticity as an instrument designed to overcome the metaphysical advancement and hence relativism. It approaches a new concept of lived world, characterized by the experience of factual life. In this context, Philosophy receives singular importance, since it is from there that it is possible to transcend towards the new and the different. Think about the meaning of things means abandoning the subject-object relationship, cherish the time and let the sense happens in language, from the force of historical tradition (Gadamer). To this end, it promotes a discussion about the effects of common sense in the legal community, whose overcome permeates, necessarily, by a phenomenological destruction. The crisis in the law, mainly represented by the judicial role, is presented as a question of democracy, idea that is defended through a contrast with the thought of Ronald Dworkin, and an approach to the perspective adopted in Brazil for Lenio Streck. Heidegger's hermeneutics is presented by the method of formal evidences, thought in the interpretive framework as a way of overcoming the relativization/entification of the senses. The interpretative character of formal evidences and its prohibitive-referential function gains strength to the extent that they understand the losses of cognition itself, the previous design, the hermeneutical circle and, as it couldn´t stop being , the own notion of Dasein. Although longer able to distinguish the typical interpretive behavior of the metaphysical tradition (ontic) of the ontological interpretative behavior, the method of formal indications craves more. Hence the interdependent relationship of the method of formal statements with morality. It´s necessary don´t waste the time for any interpretive intent, situation that is intensified when it is necessary to establish concepts for reaching results, as in the Law. The thesis that Law and morality are co-originating gains strength as we analyze some legal and philosophical theories: i) The moral dimension in Law in Otfried Höffe (Justice Policy); ii) The ethical dimension of Law and the moral authority of the Constitution; iii) The moral dimension of Law Ronald Dworkin. According to co-originating between Law and morality, the construction of the legal interpretation of a community is not content only with the form or the procedure, that because it is necessary an ethical and moral commitment to democratic substantiality that permeates the responsibility of all participants. | en |
