| dc.creator | Escobar Córdoba, Federico | |
| dc.date | 2023-03-23 | |
| dc.date | 2023-10-11T03:55:31Z | |
| dc.date | 2023-10-11T03:55:31Z | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-10-15T17:13:16Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2026-10-15T17:13:16Z | |
| dc.identifier | https://revistas.javerianacali.edu.co/index.php/criteriojuridico/article/view/1007 | |
| dc.identifier | https://vitela.javerianacali.edu.co/handle/11522/224 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12032/190432 | |
| dc.description | This article shows how legal writers in Colombia have frequently adopted the idea that
Roman jurists conceived of three divisions within the right of ownership, called usus,
fructus, and abusus. The text then turns to primary sources of Roman Law, and shows
that this concept was not theorized by Roman jurists. The analysis continues with
secondary sources of Roman Law, underscoring the fact that Colombian authors
commonly describe this triple division as a Roman creation, while foreign legal writers
on Roman Law generally do not. The article concludes by suggesting that this is one
case of what the author calls “blind spots,” referring to the way in which members of the
legal community tend to reproduce certain traditional ideas without seeing their real
content or origin. | |
| dc.description | El artículo muestra cómo la doctrina civil colombiana ha acogido recurrentemente la idea de que los romanos dividieron el derecho de propiedad en tres propiedades o atributos: usus, fructus , y abusus . Luego, el texto pasa a los textos primarios romanos, poniendo en evidencia la ausencia de esa tridivisión entre los jurisconsultos. El análisis continúa con los textos secundarios de derecho romano, resaltando la manera en que las obras colombianas con frecuencia le atribuyen al derecho romano la tridivisión, mientras los textos extranjeros normalmente no lo hacen. El artículo concluye proponiendo que este es un caso de lo que el autor llama “zonas ciegas,” la manera en que los miembros de una cultura jurídica reproducen ciertas ideas tradicionales sin ver su contenido u origen reales. | |
| dc.format | application/pdf | |
| dc.language | spa | |
| dc.publisher | Pontificia Universidad Javeriana Cali | |
| dc.relation | https://revistas.javerianacali.edu.co/index.php/criteriojuridico/article/view/1007/860 | |
| dc.rights | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 | |
| dc.source | Criterio Jurídico; Vol. 1 Núm. 6 (2006): Criterio Jurídico; 311-326 | |
| dc.source | 1657-3978 | |
| dc.subject | Derecho Romano | |
| dc.subject | propiedad | |
| dc.subject | Doctrina Civil Colombiana | |
| dc.subject | “zonas ciegas” | |
| dc.subject | cultura jurídica | |
| dc.subject | Roman law | |
| dc.subject | property | |
| dc.subject | colombian civil doctrine | |
| dc.subject | “blind zones” | |
| dc.subject | juridical culture | |
| dc.title | El derecho romano de la propiedad en la doctrina civil colombiana | |
| dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | |
| dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion | |
