Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributorRocha, Camilo
dc.creatorDuque Marín, Arturo
dc.date2023-03-02T01:34:32Z
dc.date2023-11-24T07:45:32Z
dc.date2023-02-02
dc.date2023-03-02T01:34:32Z
dc.date2023-11-24T07:45:32Z
dc.date2018
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-15T17:13:03Z
dc.date.available2026-10-15T17:13:03Z
dc.identifierhttps://vitela.javerianacali.edu.co/handle/11522/739
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12032/190264
dc.descriptionThis research empirically studies mechanisms and criteria for selecting spreaders in Twitter. Spreaders are users capable of disseminating information to large portions of the network, whether they are considered in uentials or not. This work is an initial approximation in which the Twitter social network is represented as a network and the selection mechanisms exploit its structural properties to nd suitable spreaders. Because the selection depends on di erent mechanisms (e.g. algorithmic, manual, and random selection), a comparison of the distinct features they generate, such as cost and coverage, is investigated. The cost of a spreader is assumed proportional to the coverage potential, that is, the larger the coverage potential, the greater the cost. The cost associated with the selection mechanism is the sum of the coverage potentials of all the selected initial spreaders. This work models, simulates and analyzes how di erent structural properties that characterize the nodes of a network shape information spreading in terms of the coverage and the cost of the initial spreaders. Extensive experimentation is carried out using data from the Twitter social network. These experiments illustrate how di erent selection mechanisms help shaping the dynamics of the spreading process, as well as the cost of the spreaders. Certain network metrics provide good insight for cost-e ective spreader selection, meaning that some metrics (node properties) lead to the identi cation of users with good capabilities to spread information. In general, this work identi es conditions under which an algorithmic selection mechanism o ers the best performance in terms of coverage and cost, and network metrics characterize the optimal initial spreaders in the network. The ndings can o er an alternative approach to select spreaders in commercial and advertising campaigns.
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.languagespa
dc.publisherPontificia Universidad Javeriana
dc.publisherCali
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
dc.rightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.sourcePontificia Universidad Javeriana
dc.sourceVitela
dc.subjectFacultad de Ingeniería
dc.subjectMaestría en Ingeniería con Énfasis en Ingeniería Electrónica
dc.subjectTwitter
dc.subjectSocial network
dc.subjectInformation spreading
dc.subjectCoverage
dc.subjectVoronoi
dc.subjectGraph theory
dc.titleTowards an Algorithmic Selection of Spreaders in Twitter
dc.typeMaestría
dc.typeMaestría en ingeniería Electronica
dc.typehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_bdcc
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
dc.typeTesis/Trabajo de grado - Monografía - Maestría
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
dc.typehttps://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/TM


Ficheros en el ítem

FicherosTamañoFormatoVer

No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem


© AUSJAL 2022

Asociación de Universidades Confiadas a la Compañía de Jesús en América Latina, AUSJAL
Av. Santa Teresa de Jesús Edif. Cerpe, Piso 2, Oficina AUSJAL Urb.
La Castellana, Chacao (1060) Caracas - Venezuela
Tel/Fax (+58-212)-266-13-41 /(+58-212)-266-85-62

Nuestras redes sociales

facebook Facebook

twitter Twitter

youtube Youtube

Asociaciones Jesuitas en el mundo
Ausjal en el mundo AJCU AUSJAL JESAM JCEP JCS JCAP