| dc.creator | Echeverry Restrepo, Carlos Andrés | |
| dc.date | 2023-03-23 | |
| dc.date | 2023-10-11T03:55:19Z | |
| dc.date | 2023-10-11T03:55:19Z | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-10-15T17:11:27Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2026-10-15T17:11:27Z | |
| dc.identifier | https://revistas.javerianacali.edu.co/index.php/criteriojuridico/article/view/967 | |
| dc.identifier | https://vitela.javerianacali.edu.co/handle/11522/186 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12032/189015 | |
| dc.description | This article aims to show some of the arguments that have fueled the debate
over “judicial discretion,” an issue th
at has become most evident in the
changing value of so-called auxiliary cr
iteria of judicial interpretation, like
judicial opinions and legal doctrine,
which in this case derive from
constitutional case law. Such a change in
appraisal (going from auxiliary to
principal criteria, on equal footing with
statutes), has produced a whirlwind of
criticism and support, enhanced by so
me informative flippancy from mass
media, which is still far from abating.
Nevertheless, such doctrinal disputes
help strengthen the theoretical corpus of
Colombian law, still in evolution. | |
| dc.description | El escrito pretende exponer algunos argumentos que han atizado el debate sobre la denominada “discrecionalidad judicial”, asunto que tiene su realización más palpable en el cambio de valor de los llamados criterios auxiliares de interpretación judicial como lo son la jurisprudencia y la doctrina, en este caso un resultado de la jurisdicción constitucional. Este cambio de valor, de criterio auxiliar a principal, al mismo nivel de la ley, ha generado un torbellino de críticas y respaldos magnificados por alguna ligereza informativa de los mass media que aún está lejos de amainar. Empero, tales diferencias doctrinales llevan a enriquecer el cuerpo teórico de un derecho colombiano todavía en evolución. | |
| dc.format | application/pdf | |
| dc.language | spa | |
| dc.publisher | Pontificia Universidad Javeriana Cali | |
| dc.relation | https://revistas.javerianacali.edu.co/index.php/criteriojuridico/article/view/967/822 | |
| dc.rights | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 | |
| dc.source | Criterio Jurídico; Vol. 8 Núm. 1 (2008): Criterio Jurídico; 195-216 | |
| dc.source | 1657-3978 | |
| dc.subject | Discrecionalidad judicial | |
| dc.subject | jurisdicción constitucional | |
| dc.subject | teoría del error | |
| dc.subject | interpretación judicial | |
| dc.subject | fuerza vinculante | |
| dc.subject | Judicial discretion | |
| dc.subject | Constitutional courts | |
| dc.subject | Theory of mistakes | |
| dc.subject | Judicial interpretation | |
| dc.subject | Binding force | |
| dc.title | El imperio de la discrecionalidad judicial | |
| dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | |
| dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion | |
