Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorHernández-Valdez, Alfonso
dc.contributor.authorPalomares-Aguirre, Itzel
dc.date.accessioned2025-09-23T22:36:49Z
dc.date.accessioned2026-04-28T15:58:26Z
dc.date.available2025-09-23T22:36:49Z
dc.date.available2026-04-28T15:58:26Z
dc.date.issued2025-07
dc.identifier.citationPalomares-Aguirre, I. (2025). Corporate Responses to Corruption: Symbolic and Substantive Engagement with SDG 16 in Mexico. Trabajo de obtención de grado, Especialidad en Integridad Pública y Estrategias Anticorrupción. Tlaquepaque, Jalisco: ITESO.
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12032/187119
dc.description.abstractCorruption remains one of the most persistent and complex challenges in emerging economies. In countries like Mexico, where a weak rule of law and institutional voids shape the business environment, firms often operate in contexts where corruption is both systemic and normalized. This paper examines how public firms listed on the Mexican Stock Exchange (Bolsa Mexicana de Valores, BMV) engage with anti-corruption standards and whether this engagement aligns with the targets of Sustainable Development Goal 16 (SDG 16), particularly those related to transparency, accountability, and institutional integrity. Drawing on institutional and neo-institutional theory, the study follows a two-phase approach: it first analyzes the responses of 119 firms to the Corporate Governance Questionnaire to identify broad adoption patterns, and then conducts an in-depth qualitative review of the 2022 annual reports of a 20-firm subsample to assess whether disclosures reflect substantive practices or symbolic compliance. Results show that most firms adopt a symbolic or minimal approach, with only six demonstrating substantive alignment through concrete governance mechanisms, anti-corruption measures, and accountability practices. By linking corporate practices to specific SDG 16 targets, the study highlights the fragmented and uneven commitment to transparency in a weak institutional context. The paper concludes with recommendations for companies, particularly small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), seeking to contribute meaningfully to SDG 16 through more robust governance practices.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherITESO
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/deed.es
dc.subjectCorruption
dc.subjectInstitutional Theory
dc.subjectSustainable Development Goals
dc.subjectSymbolic vs Substantive Adoption
dc.titleCorporate Responses to Corruption: Symbolic and Substantive Engagement with SDG 16 in Mexico
dc.title.alternativeRespuestas corporativas a la corrupción: compromisos simbólicos y sustantivos con los ODS 16 en México
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/academicSpecialization
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView
TOG Corporate R ... tzel Palomares Aguirre.pdf745.3Kbapplication/pdfView/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/deed.es
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/deed.es

© AUSJAL 2022

Asociación de Universidades Confiadas a la Compañía de Jesús en América Latina, AUSJAL
Av. Santa Teresa de Jesús Edif. Cerpe, Piso 2, Oficina AUSJAL Urb.
La Castellana, Chacao (1060) Caracas - Venezuela
Tel/Fax (+58-212)-266-13-41 /(+58-212)-266-85-62

Nuestras redes sociales

facebook Facebook

twitter Twitter

youtube Youtube

Asociaciones Jesuitas en el mundo
Ausjal en el mundo AJCU AUSJAL JESAM JCEP JCS JCAP