Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorSilva, Débora Oliveira da
dc.contributor.authorBorba, Maicon Carvalho de
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-23T14:55:58Z
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-28T18:57:46Z
dc.date.available2023-10-23T14:55:58Z
dc.date.available2024-02-28T18:57:46Z
dc.date.issued2023-06-29
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12032/126570
dc.description.abstractOrganizations use projects to develop their strategies, using them as a tool for innovation, search for new markets and competitiveness. Therefore, in order to achieve the objectives, carrying out an adequate project, which provides reliable information and brings expected returns after completion, is a decisive factor for organizational success. Portfolio management seeks to provide, through practices, the expected results with the application of projects and, in the case of innovation projects, to qualitatively analyze the expected returns, in a scenario of constant uncertainties. Given this, selecting and conducting a portfolio of innovation projects is a challenge for organizations inclined to innovate their products and processes. This research aimed to identify the practices used for portfolio management of innovation projects in a large organization, comparing the results found with what the literature practices according to the project typology. With the application of the case study, it was possible to identify the practices used by the organization, comparing with the existing literature on project portfolio management, focusing on innovation projects. The research results point to the use of qualitative data for portfolio management of innovation projects, which are similar to the tools and techniques described in the literature, however, they do not show standardized practices for portfolio management of innovation projects and the experience of top management is a decisive factor in the selection of projects. For traditional projects, some financial practices, outlined in the literature, are applied according to the results of the case study. With regard to portfolio balancing, there is no defined process according to the typology of projects, diverging from what the literature recommends. Therefore, the findings indicate that there are no standardized practices for portfolio management of innovation projects and project portfolio balancing, which can be characterized as an opportunity for improvement to advance performance, as well as a challenge to be faced in order to achieve standardization of innovation portfolio analyses.en
dc.description.sponsorshipCAPES - Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superiorpt_BR
dc.languagept_BRpt_BR
dc.publisherUniversidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinospt_BR
dc.rightsopenAccesspt_BR
dc.subjectGestão de portfóliopt_BR
dc.subjectPortfolio managementen
dc.titleGestão de portfólio de projetos de inovação: análise das práticas adotadas por uma empresa de engenharia de grande portept_BR
dc.typeDissertaçãopt_BR


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView
Maicon Carvalho de Borba_PROTEGIDO.pdf2.653Mbapplication/pdfView/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


© AUSJAL 2022

Asociación de Universidades Confiadas a la Compañía de Jesús en América Latina, AUSJAL
Av. Santa Teresa de Jesús Edif. Cerpe, Piso 2, Oficina AUSJAL Urb.
La Castellana, Chacao (1060) Caracas - Venezuela
Tel/Fax (+58-212)-266-13-41 /(+58-212)-266-85-62

Nuestras redes sociales

facebook Facebook

twitter Twitter

youtube Youtube

Asociaciones Jesuitas en el mundo
Ausjal en el mundo AJCU AUSJAL JESAM JCEP JCS JCAP