dc.creator | Sola Morales, Salomé | |
dc.date | 2018-10-24 | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-09-12T19:14:50Z | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-02-28T14:24:58Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-09-12T19:14:50Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-02-28T14:24:58Z | |
dc.identifier | https://revistas.ucu.edu.uy/index.php/revistadixit/article/view/1695 | |
dc.identifier | 10.22235/d.v0i29.1695 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12032/123880 | |
dc.description | The aim of this paper is to explore the different meanings given to the notion of the self. In this sense, and to know this process in depth, a review of the state of the art has been carried out and it has been delimited that there are four theoretical perspectives: the essentialist or interior vision; the existentialist or exterior vision; the absence or the denial vision; and the narrative or interpretative vision. In order to know and interpret the different epistemological traditions, the four proposed approaches have been developed succinctly. In the light of the proposed analysis, it can be concluded that these perspectives are not axiomatic and that should be studied in a complementary manner, that it is necessary to build bridges between disciplines and that different interpretations should not be treated in an exclusionary manner, but in a necessary dialogue or co-implication. | en-US |
dc.description | El propósito de este ensayo es proponer un análisis multidimensional del yo, que tiene como punto de partida la exploración de los sentidos que se le han otorgado desde diferentes perspectivas teóricas. Para ello, se realizó una revisión del estado del arte que permitió delimitar y describir de forma sucinta cuatro enfoques: la visión esencialista, la visión existencialista, la ausencia o superación de la yoidad y la visión narrativa. A la luz del análisis propuesto, se concluye que dichas perspectivas no son axiomáticas y deben ser estudiadas de manera complementaria; que es necesario tender puentes entre disciplinas y que las diferentes interpretaciones no deben tratarse de manera excluyente, sino en diálogo o coimplicación. | es-ES |
dc.format | application/pdf | |
dc.language | spa | |
dc.publisher | Universidad Católica del Uruguay | es-ES |
dc.relation | https://revistas.ucu.edu.uy/index.php/revistadixit/article/view/1695/1647 | |
dc.source | Dixit; No. 29 (2018): Dixit; 20-33 | en-US |
dc.source | Dixit; Núm. 29 (2018): Dixit; 20-33 | es-ES |
dc.source | Dixit; N.º 29 (2018): Dixit; 20-33 | pt-PT |
dc.source | 0797-3691 | |
dc.source | 1688-3497 | |
dc.source | 10.22235/d.v0i29 | |
dc.subject | self | en-US |
dc.subject | identity | en-US |
dc.subject | essence | en-US |
dc.subject | existence | en-US |
dc.subject | narrative | en-US |
dc.subject | yo | es-ES |
dc.subject | identidad | es-ES |
dc.subject | esencia | es-ES |
dc.subject | existencia | es-ES |
dc.subject | narrativa | es-ES |
dc.title | The meanings and interpretations of the self: A multidimensional analysis | en-US |
dc.title | Los sentidos e interpretaciones del yo: Un análisis multidimensional | es-ES |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion | |