Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorLopes, Maura Corcini
dc.contributor.authorEnzweiler, Deise Andréia
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-19T12:42:20Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-22T19:49:09Z
dc.date.available2022-04-19T12:42:20Z
dc.date.available2022-09-22T19:49:09Z
dc.date.issued2022-02-22
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12032/65353
dc.description.abstractThis thesis's main objective is to analyze how inclusion and school inequalities are articulated in educational statistics after the Federal Constitution of 1988. The analyzed materials cover educational statistics in groups of graphics, figures, and tables produced and/or shared by national and international agencies on the educational policies field. The analytical focus is the indicators of access, permanence, and performance in the Basic Education trajectories. The analyzed period takes as begins with the normative mark of the Federal Constitution (FC) of 1988 and the guarantee of education as a social right. The study objective embraces a thematic articulation between inclusion, learning, and school inequalities from the educational field to the sociology of education. For this purpose, it establishes an articulation as the main methodological tool. In the light of the school inequalities, it is concluded that they decrease when it comes to access to. However, permanence and performance highlight the inequalities that remain and increase by the Basic School trajectories. Considering variables such as race/ethnicity, income, and location, are identified, at least, three mechanisms that exemplify nonsuccessful trajectories in Basic Education: in/exclusion, expulsion, and precarious stays. It concludes that, if once the school was a place for few people, on the democratized school the selection is endogenous and inherent to the inclusion process. Concerning the school inequalities, the inclusion operates since the maintenance of an unstable balance, between groups and conditions tagged by multiples inequalities: far from achieving equality conditions, the inequalities lose touch – sometimes more, sometimes less – than it could be considered as a mark of equilibrium, metaphorically understood as an equality condition.en
dc.description.sponsorshipCNPQ – Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológicopt_BR
dc.languagept_BRpt_BR
dc.publisherUniversidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinospt_BR
dc.rightsopenAccesspt_BR
dc.subjectDesigualdades escolarespt_BR
dc.subjectScholar inequalitiesen
dc.titleInclusão e desigualdades escolares em estatísticas educacionais pós-Constituição Federal de 1988pt_BR
dc.typeTesept_BR


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView
Deise Andreia Enzweiler_.pdf6.932Mbapplication/pdfView/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


© AUSJAL 2022

Asociación de Universidades Confiadas a la Compañía de Jesús en América Latina, AUSJAL
Av. Santa Teresa de Jesús Edif. Cerpe, Piso 2, Oficina AUSJAL Urb.
La Castellana, Chacao (1060) Caracas - Venezuela
Tel/Fax (+58-212)-266-13-41 /(+58-212)-266-85-62

Nuestras redes sociales

facebook Facebook

twitter Twitter

youtube Youtube

Asociaciones Jesuitas en el mundo
Ausjal en el mundo AJCU AUSJAL JESAM JCEP JCS JCAP