Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorTrindade, Manoel Gustavo Neubarth
dc.contributor.authorUlisses, Claudya Celyna de Araújo Neves
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-22T13:04:52Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-22T19:47:30Z
dc.date.available2021-12-22T13:04:52Z
dc.date.available2022-09-22T19:47:30Z
dc.date.issued2021-10-15
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12032/65032
dc.description.abstractJudicialization, as a phenomenon of access to the Judiciary Power, brought incalculable advances to citizenship. On the other hand, it caused a high volume of litigation, causing the slowness and inefficiency of the judiciary. Consumer relations represent a significant part of lawsuits. And if, on the one hand, demand increases, it is necessary to think about the increase and growth of resolutions. In this aspect, the multi-door system for conflict resolution emerged – a system of access to different routes (doors), which, by considering the specific characteristics of each conflict, rationalizes the handling of disputes. Technological evolution, the complexity of relationships, the growth of electronic commerce and the increase in electronic interactions have led to the growth of online conflict resolution (ODR) methods – alternative means of conflict resolution carried out in an all-digital environment. In Brazil, the consumer.gov.br platform allows for direct dialogue between consumers and companies to resolve consumer conflicts over the internet. Monitored by consumer protection agencies and the National Consumer Secretariat (SENACON), the platform aims to: expand customer service; encourage competitiveness by improving the quality of products, services and the relationship between consumers and companies; improve policies for the prevention of behavior that violates consumer rights and strengthen the promotion of transparency in consumer relations. Thus, it is important to analyze the efficiency of the consumer.gov.br platform, as an adequate means of resolving consumer conflicts and as a tool in favor of de-judicialization. Furthermore, it is necessary to think about the imposition of a prior attempt at a consensual solution as a requirement to demand.en
dc.description.sponsorshipNenhumapt_BR
dc.languagept_BRpt_BR
dc.publisherUniversidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinospt_BR
dc.rightsopenAccesspt_BR
dc.subjectHiperjudicializaçãopt_BR
dc.subjectHyperjudicializationen
dc.titleAnálise da eficiência da plataforma virtual consumidor.gov.br como ferramenta de desjudicialização dos conflitos consumeristaspt_BR
dc.typeDissertaçãopt_BR


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView
Claudya Celyna de Araújo Neves Ulisses_.pdf1.443Mbapplication/pdfView/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


© AUSJAL 2022

Asociación de Universidades Confiadas a la Compañía de Jesús en América Latina, AUSJAL
Av. Santa Teresa de Jesús Edif. Cerpe, Piso 2, Oficina AUSJAL Urb.
La Castellana, Chacao (1060) Caracas - Venezuela
Tel/Fax (+58-212)-266-13-41 /(+58-212)-266-85-62

Nuestras redes sociales

facebook Facebook

twitter Twitter

youtube Youtube

Asociaciones Jesuitas en el mundo
Ausjal en el mundo AJCU AUSJAL JESAM JCEP JCS JCAP