Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorCopetti, Jacqueline Biancon
dc.contributor.authorGomes, Bruna Evelin
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-21T11:50:25Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-22T19:40:10Z
dc.date.available2020-08-21T11:50:25Z
dc.date.available2022-09-22T19:40:10Z
dc.date.issued2020-01-22
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12032/63598
dc.description.abstractThere is an industrial interest in research and development of microchannel heat exchangers due to the need for heat dissipation in compact systems. Cooling electronics is an example of an application that requires high heat dissipation applied, enabling a safe operating temperature. For the design of a microchannel heat exchanger, look for a minimum pressure loss, or maximum heat transfer, and an adequate and uniform temperature distribution. The present study is aimed at the development of a microchannel heat exchanger for use in electronic systems. The Constructal Design Method concomitant with an optimization were used to find the best performing geometry design, the one that allows the least flow restrictions. Straight channel geometry and branch channel level Y-channel geometry were evaluated and compared by numerical simulation, considering the temperature distribution, heat transfer coefficient and pressure loss. The geometries were fabricated in 3D printing on a silver alloy and evaluated on an experimental bench. Microchannel heat exchangers are characterized with liquid water flow in a single-phase state. The data obtained are pressure, temperature, flow rate and heat flux. The flow was laminar with Reynolds from 163 to 628, with mass flux in the range of 355 to 1,388.5 kgm-2s-1 and heat flux of 14 to 19 Wcm-2 for rectangular geometry. For Y-channel geometry with a branch level, Reynolds was in the range of 196 to 752, mass flux of 533 to 2,073.5 kgm-2s-1 and a heat flux of 16.5 to 23.5 Wcm-2. The Y-channel geometry enabled greater heat transfer with a greater pressure difference compared to channel geometry straight. For channel geometry straight, the convective heat coefficient was 14.2 kWm-2K-1 and the pressure loss was 7.2 kPa. While the Y-channel geometry, the convective heat coefficient was 24.3 kWm-2K-1 and the pressure loss was 15.9 kPa. Thus, increased heat transfer in exchange for increased pressure loss.en
dc.description.sponsorshipCAPES - Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superiorpt_BR
dc.languagept_BRpt_BR
dc.publisherUniversidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinospt_BR
dc.rightsopenAccesspt_BR
dc.subjectTrocador de calor de microcanaispt_BR
dc.subjectMicro heat exchangeren
dc.titleAnálise do escoamento monofásico de água em microcanais: desenvolvimento e caracterização de um trocador de calor para o resfriamento de sistemas eletrônicospt_BR
dc.typeDissertaçãopt_BR


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView
Bruna Evelin Gomes_.pdf3.499Mbapplication/pdfView/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


© AUSJAL 2022

Asociación de Universidades Confiadas a la Compañía de Jesús en América Latina, AUSJAL
Av. Santa Teresa de Jesús Edif. Cerpe, Piso 2, Oficina AUSJAL Urb.
La Castellana, Chacao (1060) Caracas - Venezuela
Tel/Fax (+58-212)-266-13-41 /(+58-212)-266-85-62

Nuestras redes sociales

facebook Facebook

twitter Twitter

youtube Youtube

Asociaciones Jesuitas en el mundo
Ausjal en el mundo AJCU AUSJAL JESAM JCEP JCS JCAP