Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorAzevedo, Marco Antonio Oliveira de
dc.contributor.authorOthero, Jairo Constante Bitencourt
dc.date.accessioned2016-11-22T10:56:30Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-22T19:23:32Z
dc.date.available2016-11-22T10:56:30Z
dc.date.available2022-09-22T19:23:32Z
dc.date.issued2016-09-22
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12032/60335
dc.description.abstractThis dissertation presents assisted human terminal condition in high-tech medical environments as a new social, medical and technological phenomenon. It discusses the experience of assisting death, the doctor's role, the impact of technology used and the current models for clinical diagnosis of death. The text also suggests care practices for Good Death and examines their moral and cognitive bases, addressing philosophical, scientific and social perspectives on the topic, emphasizing reflective analysis of the phenomena in medical practice. The methodology was a review and a historical-critical analysis of these practices and their philosophical and scientific roots. The dissertation is divided in three chapters, preceded by the introduction and followed by the conclusion. There is also an article attached. In the introduction, a medical interview starts tackling the theme concerning the difficulties of assisted dying. The first chapter shows the sociocultural evolution of the human terminal condition and the role of medical staff and technology in the process. The second chapter describes the experiences of the dying process by those who assist the dying and their impact on the process. The third chapter presents critical analysis of death diagnosis models, contrasting fundamentals with clinical practice. The conclusion discusses medical practices for Good Death, with its pros and cons. The conclusion brings some ideas of each chapter: based on the first chapter, it is concluded that heteronomy ultimately fragment the perception of death. In the second chapter, the conclusion is that death is a triptych process, difficult to understand in an ICU. Finally, the third chapter denies the biological and neocortical models for diagnosis of human death.en
dc.description.sponsorshipUNISINOS - Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinospt_BR
dc.languagept_BRpt_BR
dc.publisherUniversidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinospt_BR
dc.rightsopenAccesspt_BR
dc.subjectMortept_BR
dc.subjectDeathen
dc.titleA terminalidade humana assistida em ambientes de alta tecnologia médica: a natureza da morte na experiência humana, o diagnóstico médico e a boa mortept_BR
dc.typeTesept_BR


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView
Jairo Constante Bitencourt Othero_.pdf889.0Kbapplication/pdfView/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


© AUSJAL 2022

Asociación de Universidades Confiadas a la Compañía de Jesús en América Latina, AUSJAL
Av. Santa Teresa de Jesús Edif. Cerpe, Piso 2, Oficina AUSJAL Urb.
La Castellana, Chacao (1060) Caracas - Venezuela
Tel/Fax (+58-212)-266-13-41 /(+58-212)-266-85-62

Nuestras redes sociales

facebook Facebook

twitter Twitter

youtube Youtube

Asociaciones Jesuitas en el mundo
Ausjal en el mundo AJCU AUSJAL JESAM JCEP JCS JCAP