Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorAzevedo, André Filipe Zago de
dc.contributor.authorBruno, Flávio Marcelo Rodrigues
dc.date.accessioned2015-07-30T23:12:57Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-22T19:17:31Z
dc.date.available2015-07-30T23:12:57Z
dc.date.available2022-09-22T19:17:31Z
dc.date.issued2010-09-24
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12032/59158
dc.description.abstractThis study examined the practice of agricultural subsidies in international trade, being conceived on the foundations of the movement of the interdisciplinary Law and Economics. Designed based on bibliographical studies and statistics on international trade scenario, the main objective scale the practice of subsidies as a tool primarily economic strategy for the agricultural sector, especially to the United States and the European Union. The doctrine states that the ultimate economic impact of subsidies is causing distortions in international trade and ensures that in practice it has proved. This study dimensions such statements, trying to understand how the doctrine came to this conclusion and for what reasons these effects are felt in the practice of international trade. A complete ban on subsidies is not desirable because its practice, in essence, is an alternative to seeking the welfare of the nation. However, the use of subsidies, how they are being charged, especially those given to agriculture, are formed in nature protectionist interventions that distort international trade. One can identify the United States and European Union nations as they use most of subsidies in international trade, given the amount of registered cases in the WTO involving the two nations as the defendant in respect of countervailing duties to the practice of subsidizing. It was demonstrated that the levels of subsidies to the agricultural sector remain at a high level, a factor that has raised concerns about the effectiveness of international rules aimed at regulating their practice. It was identified that there was a considerable increase of trade disputes relating to countervailing duties in relation to total trade disputes involving agricultural sector. It was demonstrated that the United States and the European Union economies they use most of this trade policy instrument to intervene in international trade, examining two most notorious cases for these two economies that have been submitted to the WTO, which involve the granting subsidies in the performance of these nations in international agricultural trade.en
dc.description.sponsorshipNenhumapt_BR
dc.languagept_BRpt_BR
dc.publisherUniversidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinospt_BR
dc.rightsopenAccesspt_BR
dc.subjectWTOen
dc.subjectOMCpt_BR
dc.titleSubsídios à agricultura no comércio internacional: teoria, regulação e práticapt_BR
dc.typeDissertaçãopt_BR


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView
FlavioBruno.pdf799.4Kbapplication/pdfView/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


© AUSJAL 2022

Asociación de Universidades Confiadas a la Compañía de Jesús en América Latina, AUSJAL
Av. Santa Teresa de Jesús Edif. Cerpe, Piso 2, Oficina AUSJAL Urb.
La Castellana, Chacao (1060) Caracas - Venezuela
Tel/Fax (+58-212)-266-13-41 /(+58-212)-266-85-62

Nuestras redes sociales

facebook Facebook

twitter Twitter

youtube Youtube

Asociaciones Jesuitas en el mundo
Ausjal en el mundo AJCU AUSJAL JESAM JCEP JCS JCAP