| dc.description.abstract | This study proposes to examine the tension between publicity and privacy, seeking constitutionally adequate to establish criteria that advertising acts as a promoter of public administration transparent, especially without hurting other fundamental principles or rights with constitutional protection as privacy. Contemplating the proposed themes are addressed as conceptions of public and private tensions that guide them, the assumption of truth or veracity of information for publicity, the media's role as provider of the right to information privacy or as banal as well contribution to the constitutional principles in order to achieve a constitutionally adequate response. In this context is brought discussion ruled by the complaint of breach of fundamental precept Paragraph 144 of the Federal Supreme Court, which deals with whether or not the evaluation of the previous life of candidates for political office that could result in your ineligibility, where apparently there is conflict between constitutionally supported rights and principles, such as privacy and publicity, the right to inform and be informed and the principles of presumption of innocence, due process and adversarial. | en |
