Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorBunchaft, Maria Eugenia
dc.contributor.authorRissi, Rosmar
dc.date.accessioned2015-04-28T17:29:01Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-22T19:11:04Z
dc.date.available2015-04-28T17:29:01Z
dc.date.available2022-09-22T19:11:04Z
dc.date.issued2014-04-10
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12032/57898
dc.description.abstractThe concept of existential minimum is, in general terms, the set of material conditions essential to human existence, which is changeable, according to the culture and historical moment. Investigating the existential minimum theories under the light of democratic theories is the focus of the present study. Democracy is considered the best form of government. Add theories that aim its improvement and suitability for what is best in management of the res publica (commonwealth) occurs in the present study, through deliberative democracy, characterized by the set of assumptions and conditions for the determination of political demands in favor of cooperation in the collective will formation. The existence of assumptions of freedom and equality for cooperation in democratic deliberation is fundamental. In the existence of these assumptions, there is room for the inclusion of new social rights and the effectiveness of the existing ones. In a society governed from this theory, the concretization of rights occurs satisfactorily without the need of requiring the legal sphere. However, the civil action is an appropriate legal instrument to encourage public administration to execute policies which implement fundamental social rights when they are denied to citizens. We hold that the judicial control of public policies on fundamental social rights that enable democratic cooperation can be exceptionally exercised based on criteria such as the principles of protection deficit and the backtracking seal. The strong judicial intervention concerns with assumptions about public policies linked to the Existential Minimum, attributing to mild control public policies related to the implementation of non-fundamental social rights. As examples of the strong model of judicial review in public policy, we cite the tutelage of the subjective right to provision in natura or when the budget is revealed unconstitutional, disregarding the Existential Minimum or not being isonomic. The Brazilian society claims for new social rights, especially free public transport, which already exists in small towns. Achieved social rights, such as health, education, social security and others, have universal access, but there are gaps in service provision to citizens. The existential minimum has no express mention in the Brazilian legislation, but it is present through the principles and fundamental rights.en
dc.description.sponsorshipNenhumapt_BR
dc.languagept_BRpt_BR
dc.publisherUniversidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinospt_BR
dc.rightsopenAccesspt_BR
dc.subjectMínimo existencialpt_BR
dc.subjectExistential minimumen
dc.titleTeoria do mínimo existencial à luz de pressupostos democráticospt_BR
dc.typeDissertaçãopt_BR


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView
Rosmar Rissi.pdf1.076Mbapplication/pdfView/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


© AUSJAL 2022

Asociación de Universidades Confiadas a la Compañía de Jesús en América Latina, AUSJAL
Av. Santa Teresa de Jesús Edif. Cerpe, Piso 2, Oficina AUSJAL Urb.
La Castellana, Chacao (1060) Caracas - Venezuela
Tel/Fax (+58-212)-266-13-41 /(+58-212)-266-85-62

Nuestras redes sociales

facebook Facebook

twitter Twitter

youtube Youtube

Asociaciones Jesuitas en el mundo
Ausjal en el mundo AJCU AUSJAL JESAM JCEP JCS JCAP