| dc.description.abstract | This study aimed to assess the compliance of forensic reports prepared by accounting experts of the judicial district of Tangará da Serra, MT. It was used an applied research methodology, once it has been developed to address a specific problem, and a quali-quantitative approach, once the answer to the problem was found by quantitative and qualitative means analysis. Regarding the research objective, it qualifies as descriptive, once the obtained data were subject to descriptive analysis in the chapter regarding the analysis; and documentary, once it was used forensic reports and sentences by judges from a sample of cases within a period from 2006 to 2010. The obtained data showed that the experts work was adequate, once they have made their reports based on normative precepts; the use of their reports by the judges was very satisfactory, providing the basis for their decisions; and it was possible to see the closeness between forensic accounting and the theory of communicative action of Habermas, once the forensic report is a tool that socially acts to clarify and provide technical basis for resolving disputes. | en |
